2010 11, May 6:27 am

“SHOCKED AND DISGUSTED” DAIILY MAIL READERS

Just what are the Great British public going to think if we end up being governed by another unelected Prime Minister?  If you look at a political map of the UK it is mostly blue.  The public

voted mainly for Conservatives, the public do not want a Labour Government, they do not want a Lid-Dem government, they want a Conservative Government and that’s how they voted,

but due to the stupid way voting works in this country there is a very real chance that we will end up with a Lab-Lib coalition government who are neither wanted nor voted for.  What

happened to Government elected by the people?  Those bloody socialist Labour and Nick the Turd Clegg are busy putting paid to that.
Gordon Brown has said he is going to quit, but as usual he’s not going to do it now, oh no, he’s going to do it in 3 or 4 months time.  Yet more dithering by the one-eyed gimp.  He’s not

falling on his sword for the better of the country, he’s also not the saviour of the world no matter how much he thinks he is, the guy is just an incompetent, bad tempered, 2-faced,

hypocritical, unelected, non-mandated fuck-wit.
Nick Clegg is a two-timing idiot with ideas above his station, just because he did well in a TV debate once he’s gone all Emperor on everyone and thinks that he’s Julius Ceasar and is going

to rule the world, yes, well, we all know what happened to him, “et tu Brutus?” or in this case it’s going to be “Et tu Brown”
I’m embarrassed by what is going on politically in this reason, as a nation we are looked down upon by the more powerful countries governments and people, and now look, we look even

more stupid, we can’t organise a decent election, can’t form a government and everyone is tugging their forelocks at Nick Clegg instead of bitch slapping him and telling him to fuck off,

he’s not wanted.
Come on Cameron, grow some balls, form a minority government and govern.

Well it looks like Daily Mail readers really are very easily “Shocked and disgusted”.  I commented on a story on their website yesterday, it was regarding a premature baby that had

survived, the headline read “Squeeze from a minute and premature baby’s finger that said ‘I will survive’”  A lovely story with a happy ending, it’s great to read happy things like that when

all around is doom and gloom.  I just happen to have commented that “Finger gripping is a reflex action and means nothing.” Which in itself it really doesn’t, put your finger in a baby’s hand

and it will grip it, that’s what they do, imagine my surprise when within minutes there were a couple of hundred red arrows against my comment with some pretty harsh comments from

other readers regarding my comments.  Shortly afterwards I received an email from the Daily Mail saying they had received complaints about my comments and had removed it pending a

review, 10 minutes later I got another email saying they were no re-instating my comment.  That’s fair enough, I apparently do not fit their commenting demographic and offend their

commenting criteria.  But Daily Mail, what is the point in deleting my original comment and leaving it quoted by 4 or 5 other people for all to see anyway? URNGH!
“Shocked and disgusted” said Daily Mail reader indeed.
Liz from Farnborough said “How dare you make a comment like that!”
Rob from Bromsgrove said “Erin is a warrior”
L.S. Uk said “How dare you beliitle that. It meant EVERYTHING to them.”
Corrina NW said “… your comment means nothing to anyone”
SusieWinwood England said “perhaps if you have no worthwhile comment it’s best to keep schtum!”
Ann Lannerconrwall said “Can you not see what the picture symbolizes!!!! If you cant I pity you.”
All seem to fit the Daily Mail stereotype, only their opinion counts, if yours isn’t the same as theirs then you you’re not allowed to have one.  If they are so easily offended then why the

heck do they read the Daily Mail?
To Liz I say that my opinion is no less valid than yours, stop being so up yourself.
To Rob I say, Erin is not old enough to be a warrior, to say she is a survivor would be much more accurate.
To L.S. I say I am not belittling anything, and you really do need to get over yourself and seek professional help for your anger issues.
To Corrina I say I was passing comment, I’m entitled to that, what makes your comment more meaningful?.
To Susie I say ditto to what I said to Corrina
To Ann I say that what the picture symbolises is obvious, I didn’t miss the point, I just offered a simple fact.  I pity your indignation.
To all the Daily Mail readers I offended I say get over yourselves, my opinion is MY opinion, that’s all it is and I’m entitled to it, just as you are entitled to yours.


by Philip Robbins Mild Ramblings, General Ramblings, Government, Politically Correct Crap
Comments (2)
2010 8, February 7:40 am

BLAIR, BROWN, CAMPBELL, GROUPS

Cherie - what a dreadful mouth - Blair has got herself embroiled in leftie pinko socialist mess by letting a Muslim guy off a prison sentence for punching another man in the face during a row in a queue inside a bank.  Miah - who had just been to a mosque - punched Mr Furcan inside the bank, and again outside the building.  Punching him once could be seen as a knee jerk reaction, but punching him again a while later is just plain wrong and even more inexcusable than punching him the first time.
Blair told Miah that violence had to be taken seriously, but said she would suspend his prison sentence because he was a religious person and had not been in trouble before.  She added: “You are a religious man and you know this is not acceptable behaviour.”
This really does give out all the wrong signals, people need to know that first they live by the law of the land, and secondly by the law of your religion.

What’s with the crying politicians at the moment? Serial ditherer Gordon Brown had a highly staged cry during a televised interview with Penis Morgan the other day over the death of his daughter in 2002.  Whilst it is tragic when ever anyone dies especially a child, expressing ones grief 8 years later is not for general consumption and should be kept private.  Unfortunately for some it was a vote winning performance and that is indeed unfortunate.  Alistair Campbell then proceeded to try to cry on the Andrew Marr show on Sunday morning when pressed about Tony Blair’s involvement with the invasion of Iraq.  Again it looked staged, insincere and about as convincing as a vegetarian fox.  Maybe Alistair was just sucking up to that idiot Gordon Brown.  By the way, did you know that the meaning of Campbell is “crooked mouth”  forked-tongue would be more accurate.

Gordon Brown has also decided to defend his 3 party members who are waiting to be prosecuted for their expenses claims; they are hiding behind an old bit of legislation of Parliamentary Privilege which makes them immune from prosecution for anything they say while in Parliament.  What Brown ought to be doing is to tell them to take it on the chin and not try to hide behind anything at all, but no, they have his backing and again we see Gordon’s incompetence coming into play and just how crooked Labour in general has become.  Considering they are the people’s party and socialists etc. they have done a very good job of lining their own nests in spectacular fashion.

A article in one of the papers was headlined “Andy Bell is going to be performing at European Gay Ski Week in March”. Well, that’s very nice for Andy Bell and for everyone concerned, but there something I’m either missing or do not understand.  Why is there specifically a European Gay Ski Week?  There is a European Ski Week where everyone is welcome whether they be gay or heterosexual, it’s not called the European Heterosexual Ski Week and no one is excluded, but by calling this one the European Gay Ski Week there’s an impression that heterosexuals are not particularly welcome.  Isn’t that discriminatory?  There’s the same thing with the Police Association in which all police are welcome to join no matter when their ethnic back ground, but there is also the Black Police Association which implies that it’s for blacks only, is that not discriminatory on the grounds of skin colour?  There’s also the Black Labour party, and so it carries on.  So many minority groups of people strive for acceptance and to be treated with the same decency and respect as everyone else as they absolutely ought to be, so why do they have to have groups which exclude others and treat others as they themselves do not want to be treated?

by Philip Robbins Mild Ramblings, General Ramblings, Government, Politically Correct Crap
Comments (0)

Pages

Categories

Archives

Feeds

Meta